Ex-nay on your Eelings-fay.
I have four siblings: one brother with two sisters on either side. I'm the second oldest. There are benefits of having so many siblings, not least of which is that when there are quarrels--and there's always something brewing somewhere--chances are good that every one of us feels a connection to at least one of the others.
But there are certain repeat offenders in the social contract, and in a family that tends to mean that everyone else compensates, or assumes burdens unfairly; somehow--and I don't really get it--the offenders are rarely asked to make things right. They suffer in their way: they don't have the same intimate connection with their siblings that the rest do (though they seem to garner more attention from their parents, who, I suppose, worry about them more.) But they don't seem to mind. Or they don't mind enough to change. Or they don't see that the issue is their own.
The problem is, since the offender is not taken to task by the group, it tends to be the wounded party that's asked to pony up the peace: to show up at holiday gatherings and act As If; to let it go--to get over it. And if I could recount for you the offenses--not silly little offenses, but major, life-changing stuff--you'd understand why this blaming of the victim is so obscene. How does a person forgive a wound that's never even acknowledged? And why should they be asked to?
My younger sister--not an offender, not ever--has had more than her share of burdens to bear in this realm. It's in part because she's the most responsible of all of us: the saver, the careful planner, the conservative. (She's even gone over to the Other Side politically, which I have to forgive because I adore her so.) One sibling ruined her financially and then lied about having done it. In a year, this sister had put her life back together--had surpassed the rest of us in terms of togetherness, even. And having gone through that--and mind-boggling abuses that followed from another sibling--my sister got her head straight about what a person must bear in a family, and what's unreasonable to bear. And she's acting on it, without apology. But also, sadly, at additional cost to her.
I keep trying to watch for these bad patterns in my own family, with the kids. No sign of it yet, but I'm staying vigilant. They've only got each other: there's no room for nonsense and abuse.
Families, man. They're not for sissies.
6 Comments:
I pretty much cut off one branch of my extended family because my oldest cousin was a wife-beater, and the rest of the family first ignored and then defended him. When my grandmother was alive I would put up with him/them at gatherings; since her death I have tolerated him at funerals and such, but won't go out of my way to speak to him.
My Aunt and Uncle aren't very happy with me about this, because it means I don't see them either, but I just can't excuse him...
After over 20 years his wife finally left, citing the abuse and having it stand up in court; still they persist in ignoring and defending him. He called me when he remarried and asked me to photograph their wedding; I made an excuse instead of telling him what I thought...
Not sure which way things are better; to have it out or bite your tongue!
alan
amen. i am in the thick of this on several fronts.
titus 3:10: "warn a factious person once, then warn him again. after that, have nothing to do with him."
but i wonder if having nothing to do with him is necessarily the best tack to take, if only because the opposite of love isn't cruelty, but indifference, and there comes a point where even refusal becomes, in its way, an indifference, and consequently, a cruelty. not only against the victim, but the perpetrator.
isn't it, after all, criminal to allow the criminal to continue on uncensured? isn't anything short of actively refusing intolerable behaviour itself a form of complicity? isn't it more compassionate to pillory a man for his misdeeds --when reason and kindness fail, humiliation becomes the last, best hope -- rather than to sit idly by and allow him to mistreat others?
it certainly seems that way to me now. i've tried the ignoring part, and found that it hasn't worked, but now i'm left in another mess: censure doesn't work on those without shame.
help.
So true, so true.
But being vigilant is GREAT.
i am telling you, my family is the most dysfunctional one this side of the mississippi...
my 2 sisters and 1 brother and i no longer speak...well, they all speak to each other, it's just that i don't speak to any of them...i just can't be as shitty as they are, so it's a very uneven playing field, and it's better that i just keep away...so since i won't speak to them they now send me nasty e-mails...i don't open them...
yeah, you're right, families are not for sissies, but sometimes you just have to know when to fold 'em, ya know?
love, sweetie...
you reap what you sow...
and YOU sow love and honesty and respect, it seems..
patterns do not always repeat, i promise..
my own family is living proof.. i could tell some stories... but not now..
I hope that things are sorted out, and that your sister heals and does what she needs to to feel good and balanced again..
wishing you happy..
Inger-I have been having so much trouble with my brother Mike since July. Things seem to be better but I learned it was due to my relationship with Gill. I still haven't figured out what that was all about hey, it is over.
The thing I miss the most is the person who use to be the moderator and helped to fix it all. Since my mom has been gone it seems we all grow further apart on a yearly basis.
Keep your eye out.....
Love ya,
Mary
Post a Comment
<< Home