Friday, June 09, 2006

I can't help but think

that words like this wouldn't have the same punch today. Is it because we've grown accustomed to indecency? How else to explain a phenomenon like Ann Coulter?

***

This Day In History 1954
Joseph McCarthy meets his match

In a dramatic confrontation, Joseph Welch, special counsel for the U.S. Army, lashes out at Senator Joseph McCarthy during hearings on whether communism has infiltrated the U.S. armed forces. Welch's verbal assault marked the end of McCarthy's power during the anticommunist hysteria of the Red Scare in America.

Senator McCarthy (R-Wisconsin) experienced a meteoric rise to fame and power in the U.S. Senate when he charged in February 1950 that "hundreds" of "known communists" were in the Department of State. In the years that followed, McCarthy became the acknowledged leader of the so-called Red Scare, a time when millions of Americans became convinced that communists had infiltrated every aspect of American life. Behind closed-door hearings, McCarthy bullied, lied, and smeared his way to power, destroying many careers and lives in the process. Prior to 1953, the Republican Party tolerated his antics because his attacks were directed against the Democratic administration of Harry S. Truman. When Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower entered the White House in 1953, however, McCarthy's recklessness and increasingly erratic behavior became unacceptable and the senator saw his clout slowly ebbing away. In a last-ditch effort to revitalize his anticommunist crusade, McCarthy made a crucial mistake. He charged in early 1954 that the U.S. Army was "soft" on communism. As Chairman of the Senate Government Operations Committee, McCarthy opened hearings into the Army.

Joseph N. Welch, a soft-spoken lawyer with an incisive wit and intelligence, represented the Army. During the course of weeks of hearings, Welch blunted every one of McCarthy's charges. The senator, in turn, became increasingly enraged, bellowing "point of order, point of order," screaming at witnesses, and declaring that one highly decorated general was a "disgrace" to his uniform.


On June 9, 1954, McCarthy again became agitated at Welch's steady destruction of each of his arguments and witnesses. In response, McCarthy charged that Frederick G. Fisher, a young associate in Welch's law firm, had been a long-time member of an organization that was a "legal arm of the Communist Party." Welch was stunned. As he struggled to maintain his composure, he looked at McCarthy and declared, "Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness." It was then McCarthy's turn to be stunned into silence, as Welch asked, "Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?" The audience of citizens and newspaper and television reporters burst into wild applause. Just a week later, the hearings into the Army came to a close. McCarthy, exposed as a reckless bully, was officially condemned by the U.S. Senate for contempt against his colleagues in December 1954. During the next two-and-a-half years McCarthy spiraled into alcoholism. Still in office, he died in 1957.

7 Comments:

Blogger Grumpy Old Man said...

Ann was over the top, which is her stock in trade, and has justly been taken to task by many.

Nevertheless, I think this particular subset of 9/11 widows has taken some foolish, partisan positions. I don't agree with Maureen Dowd (anent Cindy Sheehan) that the loss of a family member endows one with "absolute moral authority."

If you're wrong, you're wrong, tragic loss or no. If you're right, you're right, even if you're a rich middle-class white guy who didn't serve in the military.

The argumentum ad hominem or ad feminam is still a fallacy.

10:11 AM  
Blogger I n g e r said...

Victims and families of victims have always been effective vehicles of change, maybe because it's still hard for us--so far, anyway--to tune out human tragedy. Certainly I'd accord the widows more of a moral authority on 9/11 issues than some blogger from Des Moines, say, or a leggy blonde with a filthy mouth and a gimmick.

Jim Brady's wife--look at her on the gun control bill. The Amber Alert system. John Walsh. I know Cindy Sheehan's not your cup of tea, but she's not the first mourning mother to protest a war, and it confounds me that anyone who hasn't lost a child that way would try to make her the problem. Why is she the problem? I'm asking.

10:31 AM  
Blogger I n g e r said...

Never mind. I'm in a bad mood.

On to the weekend.

10:58 AM  
Blogger Grumpy Old Man said...

Enjoy your weekend.

It should be nice in Md. in June.

7:35 PM  
Blogger sttropezbutler said...

HYPE seems to come to mind.

She is the master...the Barnum and Bailey of the conservative movement.

This will be all I say about her. I refuse to give her the power.

STB

6:21 AM  
Blogger phosda said...

nobody mess with ann coulter. she's doing beautifully, and i am privileged enough to know what she's up to: she's a double agent, in more ways than one.

she used to be called colt anter, and starred in 70s leather porn. then she decided that she wanted to become a girl, but couldn't finance the surgery. she could, however, afford a dye job. so she became a righty pundit, since that's where the money is, and realised that a fringe benefit of the job is that she had the ear of those in power. so she decided to keep it, insinuating herself into the GOP, so that she might, at a later date, stun them all by revealing her former identity, shaming conservatives for their stupidity by revealing that they'd all been had by a leather fag cum tranny. she hasn't blown her cover yet, but there's no arguing with that adam's apple.

when someone says that ann coulter has balls, they don't know how right they are.

6:09 PM  
Blogger nancy =) said...

rock on, 37oline =)

that was fabulous...

peace...

9:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home